Thursday, October 14, 2010

Price The Virus and the Vaccine: Contaminated Vaccine, Deadly Cancers, and Government Neglect


Over All Rating Reviews :
This story is incredible and likely to disturb readers to the core. There are so many ways to go with writing a review. First, there's the readability factor: Scores a 10 there - it's a page turner as others have written. I read it over the course of 3 nights and found, like others, that it reads like a thriller or perhaps even a Grisham novel - only this story is TRUE.

Second, there's the important lessons for all of humankind factor: Scores a 10 in this department as well. Polio vaccine is a human invention; human beings are not infallible, they have never been infallible, and by extension there never has been nor will there ever be a human invention that is not prone to errors in human thinking, reasoning, and judgment and not subject to continuous improvements and/or great change as human knowledge advances.

Despite this undeniable truth, large health organizations and government health agencies would like the public to believe a very one-sided message about polio vaccine: that it is a medical milestone worthy of great praise and worship as it has delivered mankind from the evils of the childhood affliction of polio. Amen.

But that's only half the story. This book is about the other half - the one you won't read about in the press and that's about a great trade off of the polio vaccine. In exchange for reducing the rate of paralytic polio instances in childhood, has this wondrous medical marvel cut decades off many of our friends' and neighbors' lives? We all know people, some of them really great people, who died of rare and mysterious cancers in their 30s, 40s and 50s. They were diagnosed with cancer and as soon as treatments began their tumors spread fast and they succumbed quickly to their strange form of cancer. They left behind spouses, children and parents who will never be cared for by them in youth and old age.

I'm not suggesting that all, most or even some of these deaths are a result of SV-40 contaminated polio vaccine, but we are not in a position at present to ever know for sure as the party-line from the organizations who are supposed to protect public health continues to be that SV-40 in polio vaccines has not been proven to cause harm to man.

Please read this book and encourage other thinking people to read it too. There are many lessons that can be and should be learned from the polio vaccine history and SV-40 story. You'll also come away with new modern-day heroes who, unlike so many of the icons of today, are truly worthy of your respect and admiration. There are the scientists and researchers like Bernice Eddy, Michele Carbone and others who did and continue to do the right thing despite the many pressures to not stir up this pot. And then the biggest heroes of all in my mind are the authors for taking the time and dedicating years of their lives to accurately tell this great story...the true story that plain and simply has to be told.
Get more detail about The Virus and the Vaccine: Contaminated Vaccine, Deadly Cancers, and Government Neglect.


!1#: White Dress Suit Buy Online !: HDTV Sale !: Discount Lcd Tv !: Converse Review

Best Buy The Virus and the Vaccine: Contaminated Vaccine, Deadly Cancers, and Government Neglect


Over All Rating Reviews :
This book rocked my world,as a baby boomer with a fatal brain cancer.I have always been a proponent of vaccines and had my now 26 year old son vaccinated with everything around.Now he has a baby daughter and he and his wife have decided not to have her vaccinated for anything but tetnaus.I am totally behind them now,which is probably one of the reasons this information has been supressed so long.

I had to put the book down in the middle for a week or so,I was so outraged at the governments denial of this simian virus 40 and how they trashed,fired,and vilified every researcher that found SV40 in cancer.

I am a medical professional so the book was not too difficult to understand,but I would not recommend it to someone who sticks to "light reading."

Got 15 pages more but needed a break.I am supposed to get flu shots but will be looking at syringes full of vaccine with a much warier eye.

Anyone remember the "hog flu" during Fords administration that was supposed to be a horrible epidemic? It turned out to be nothing and people were getting awful (like Guillan-Barre) side effects from it.

Cripes,I need a punching bag.I guess the NIH will have to do.

Get more detail about The Virus and the Vaccine: Contaminated Vaccine, Deadly Cancers, and Government Neglect.


!: Discount Tv Plasma !: Bargain Sale Basketball Shorts !: Low Price HDTV Lcd Flat

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Buy Libby, Montana: Asbestos and the Deadly Silence of an American Corporation


Over All Rating Reviews :
Truth be told, asbestos will not kill 100% of everybody. Consider these stats: Industrial accidents comprise 1.1 million deaths, which exceeds the average annual deaths from road accidents (999,000), war (502,000), violence (563,000) and HIV/AIDS (312,000). Of this total deaths from asbestos exposure equals about 100,000 (9% of all industrial accidents, and only 2.9% of the total deaths above).

Yet the mesothelioma lobby would want you to believe that asbestos--which is a mineral known since ancient times--will kill everybody unless it's totally removed.

This reporter tries to ape Aron Brockovitch, and plays up to the hype. In fact, it gives just one side of the story. The other side is this: the people at Libby supported asbestos while the going was good, yet when demand died down, they turned against it. You cannot have your cake and eat it too. Harsh but true. BTW, I have nothing against cancer sufferors, just pointing out that there's a lobby of lawyers who make a killing filing lawsuits on behalf of mesothelioma victims. And this book plays to that lobby.

Get more detail about Libby, Montana: Asbestos and the Deadly Silence of an American Corporation.


!: New Boot Leg Jeans !: Graco Pack n Play TotBloc Playard, Bugs Quilt by Graco Baby

Monday, October 4, 2010

Stage Two Colorectal Cancer Turned Terminal After Chemotherapy

Henry (T 546, not real name) is a 52-year-old male. Sometime in August 2004, his problem started with changed bowel habits and there was blood in his stools. An endoscopy revealed sigmoid colon cancer. Henry underwent a surgery to remove 10 inches of his infected bowel. It was a Stage 2 cancer. CT showed that his liver and spleen were normal in size and appearance. Both kidneys and adrenal glands were also normal in appearance. The urinary bladder was normal. There was no pelvic mass or lymph node enlargement. The lung bases did not show any nodule. Based on these findings, the doctor concluded that there was NO evidence of distance metastasis.

Following standard protocol, Henry underwent six cycles of chemotherapy. The treatment lasted six months and was completed in February 2005. A follow up CT scan on 18 March 2005 revealed "possible metastasis in the left lung base" but the liver, both kidneys and urinary bladder were all normal.

In October 2005, Henry suffered severe pains due to suspected urine infection. A CT scan on 8 October 2005, indicated "left hydronephosis", which according to the doctor could be due to "a mid ureteric stone." However, the CT of the chest revealed at least five well defined nodules in both lung fields. This result clearly showed that Henry suffered multiple lung metastasis.

Earlier, the doctor suspected kidney stone. But it was not to be. A more detailed examination showed tumor in his left kidney. A biopsy report dated 31 March 2006 indicated moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma of the left lower ureter. This was suggestive of metastasis from colonic primary. Henry was asked to undergo another surgery to remove the infected kidney but he declined.

On 4 April 2006 a colonic biopsy showed recurrence of the colon cancer. The doctor had to install a stent in his colon to prevent tumour from blocking the passageway. CT scan also showed presence of a 1.5 cm nodule in segment 8 of his liver. There was a tiny hypodense focus in segment 3 suspicious of a new lesion.

On 15 July 2006, a CT scan of the chest, abdomen and pelvis was done. It showed a 2 cm mass in the mid rectum extending up to the rectosigmoid junction. The report confirmed once again a recurrent carcinoma of the rectosigmloid region with local infiltration and metastasis to the lungs, liver and left ureter.

Henry underwent three cycles of chemotherapy and each treatment cycle cost him about RM 15,000. Unfortunately the treatment was not effective. The oncologist suggested more chemotherapy using a different drug regiment. This new treatment costs RM 25,000 per cycle. Henry had two cycles of this treatment and became completely bald. He developed acne with pus all over his face and some parts of his body. He was given antibiotics by a dermatologist but his condition worsened.

On 7 March 2007, MRI of the lumber spine indicated multiple focal bony metatasis involving the sacrum and illium. There was also direct involvement of the urinary bladder. A biopsy of the bladder tumor done on 30 March 2007 indicated a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma and was likely to be an extension from a colorectal tumor. In essence, Henry ended with more cancer spread -- this time to his urinary bladder and bone.

Henry said his doctors installed three stents in his body -- two colonic stents and one stent for his kidney to prevent further tumor blockage. Henry was asked to undergo more chemotherapy or radiotherapy. He declined and came to seek our help instead.

Comments: This is a sad story indeed. Let me point out that Henry started off with a Stage 2 colorectal cancer without any metastasis whatsoever. After surgery and chemotherapy his fortune turned for the worse. Compare this story with other Cases that I have related earlier. These people had more serious cancer than Henry but they declined chemotherapy. And they did not have any recurrence or metastasis. The question is: "Why not recurrence or metastasis."

This has always been my hunch all along after observing patients for more than a decade: "Could chemotherapy have caused all these metastasis and havoc?" I have no way to argue because I have no data to support by observation. However, let me alert you to the three quotations below:

A small, insignificant column in The Star on 7 April 2007 had this heading: "Study: Treatment may fuel cancer's spread." The study reported in the Journal of Clinical Investigation by Dr. Carlos Arteaga and colleagues at Vanderbilt University, USA, showed that treating cancer with surgery, chemotherapy or radiation may sometimes cause tumors to spread. In their work they used doxorubicin (a common chemo-drug used for breast cancer) or radiation and found that these treatments raised levels of TGF-beta, which in turn helped breast cancer tumors to spread to the lung. The researchers wrote: "The repopulation and progression of tumours after anti-cancer therapy (such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery) is a well-recognised phenomenon." Is this research relevant to Henry's Case?

Andrew Weil wrote (in Health and Healing): "There is never ending struggle. Patients are sucked into same way of thinking, finding themselves more and more dependent on the system giving one treatment after another." How true are these words as applied to Henry's case?

Professor Jane Plant (in Your Life in Your Hands) wrote: "This sounds like a battle between the disease and the treatments -- with the patient as the battle ground. Conventional cancer treatment can process patients to the extent that they no longer understand what is really being done to them."

Let me end by these words: For colon cancer, the way to go could be just a change of one's lifestyle and diet besides taking herbs. It could prove to be far more effective and humane than the so-called scientific medicine. Read the cases I have presented so far and make your own conclusion.

Note: After three weeks on herbs, Henry reported that his health had improved and he decided to continue taking the herbs.

My Links : !: Mesothelioma Diagnosis !: Answer Chrysotile Mesothelioma !: Learn Adenocarcinoma Lung Cancer


Twitter Facebook Flickr RSS



Français Deutsch Italiano Português
Español 日本語 한국의 中国简体。